Skip to main content
· 3/21/2005

Knight v. American Suzuki Motor Corp.

Citations

  • 612 S.E.2d 546
  • 272 Ga. App. 319
  • 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 962
  • 56 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 840
  • 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 278

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Assuming the purchaser has maintained his vehicle in the manner specified, it is the refusal to remedy within a reasonable time, or a lack of success in the attempts to remedy [that] would constitute a breach of warranty”
  • trial court erred in granting summary judgment on ground not raised in motion without giving nonmovant proper notice that issue would be considered
  • summary judgment improper where nonmovant is not given full and fair notice and an opportunity to respond to particular ground
  • summary judgment improper where nonmovant is not given full and fair notice and an opportunity to respond to particular ground
  • \Georgia law imposes two conditions before a breach of a written warranty can exist: (1) notice of the defect and (2) a reasonable opportunity to repair the defect.\
  • “MagnusonMoss Warranty Act creates no claims except for attorney fees and relies upon state law to create and define implied warranties, breach, and some kinds of damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams, Ruffin, Bernes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.