Skip to main content
· 6/15/1893

Knight & Knight v. Towles

Citations

  • 32 Fla. 473

Syllabus

<p>1. The necessity to a suit in error of lodging the writ of error in the court rendering the judgment which it is sought to have reviewed, is not supplied by an order of that court allowing such writ and directing that it shall operate as a supersedeas to the judgment, and a compliance with the provisions of the order as to the supersedeas bond.</p> <p>£. If it be that a writ of e.-ror can ever be issued and served nunc pro tunc, after the lapse of the time allowed by law for bringing suits in error, the default must be attributable solely to official delinquency in the premises.</p>

Judges: Haney, Raney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.