Knight & Knight v. Towles
Citations
- 32 Fla. 473
Syllabus
<p>1. The necessity to a suit in error of lodging the writ of error in the court rendering the judgment which it is sought to have reviewed, is not supplied by an order of that court allowing such writ and directing that it shall operate as a supersedeas to the judgment, and a compliance with the provisions of the order as to the supersedeas bond.</p> <p>£. If it be that a writ of e.-ror can ever be issued and served nunc pro tunc, after the lapse of the time allowed by law for bringing suits in error, the default must be attributable solely to official delinquency in the premises.</p>
Judges: Haney, Raney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hudgins v. Kemp, Assignee, &C.Supreme Court· 1856-05-14· cited 18×
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida· 1892-01-15· cited 13×
- Crippen v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Florida· 1868-07-01· cited 7×
- Smith v. CurtisSupreme Court of Florida· 1883-01-15· cited 5×
- Booten v. Bank of the Empire StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1881-03-15· cited 4×
- Chaffe v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1884-06-15· cited 4×
- Underwood v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Florida· 1868-07-01· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.