Skip to main content
· 1/30/2026

Knife Rights, Inc. v. Bonta

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, when a trial court orders and reviews a PSI report prior to sentencing, this Court presumes the trial court “was aware of all relevant sentencing factors”
  • stating that, when a trial court orders and reviews a PSI report prior to sentencing, this Court presumes the trial court “was aware of all relevant sentencing factors”
  • finding trial court did not abuse its discretion in rejecting appellant’s weight challenge of this third-degree murder conviction, as forensic evidence refuted appellant’s self-defense claim and supported the murder conviction
  • rejecting appellant’s claim that the trial court abused its sentencing discretion in focusing solely on the seriousness of the offense, where the court expressly considered appellant’s PSI as well as other evidence at sentencing
  • weight claim based on conflict in testimony
  • weight claim based on conflict in testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.