Knierim v. Leatherwood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that courts use the standing doctrine to decide whether a particular plaintiff is “properly situated to prosecute the action.”
• holding that courts use the standing doctrine to decide whether a particular plaintiff is “properly situated to prosecute the action[]”
• holding that courts use the standing doctrine to decide whether a particular plaintiff is “properly situated to prosecute the action.”
• holding that courts use the standing doctrine to decide whether a particular plaintiff is “properly situated to prosecute the action.”
• holding that courts use the standing doctrine to decide whether a particular plaintiff is “properly situated to prosecute the action.”
• “[Standing] is used to refuse to determine the merits of a legal controversy irrespective of its correctness where the party advancing it is not properly situated to prosecute the action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).