Tennessee Supreme Court· 10/18/1976

Knierim v. Leatherwood

Citations

542 S.W.2d 806
1976 Tenn. LEXIS 521

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that courts use the standing doctrine to decide whether a particular plaintiff is “properly situated to prosecute the action.”
holding that courts use the standing doctrine to decide whether a particular plaintiff is “properly situated to prosecute the action[]”
holding that courts use the standing doctrine to decide whether a particular plaintiff is “properly situated to prosecute the action.”
holding that courts use the standing doctrine to decide whether a particular plaintiff is “properly situated to prosecute the action.”
holding that courts use the standing doctrine to decide whether a particular plaintiff is “properly situated to prosecute the action.”
“[Standing] is used to refuse to determine the merits of a legal controversy irrespective of its correctness where the party advancing it is not properly situated to prosecute the action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

106 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.