Skip to main content
· 1/19/1982

Knickerbocker Toy Company, Inc. v. Azrak-Hamway International, Inc.

Citations

  • 668 F.2d 699
  • 214 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 175
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 22526

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[t]o prevail on a claim of copyright infringement, a plaintiff must show both ownership of a valid copyright and copying”
  • defendant's voluntary termination of infringing conduct and assurance that it would not infringe in the future supported denial of injunctive relief
  • the only evidence in the record concerning the defendant’s use of the “blister card” was that it was “a sample ... produced in order to position the artwork, and that a totally different illustration would be used for the production run of the card”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, Friendly, Pierce

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.