Knepper v. Genstar Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that whether an entity is a joint venture is a question for the jury
• \The existence of a joint venture is commonly a fact question to be determined by the trier of fact.\
• existence of joint venture commonly a fact question to be determined by trier of fact; sufficient evidence may be adduced to establish all elements of joint venture
• “A statement is qualifiedly privileged if made by one who has a duty or interest in the subject matter to one who has a corresponding duty or interest.”
• “[W]here a qualified privilege exists plaintiffs must prove express malice or malice in fact in order to recover. Express malice, or malice in fact, constitutes an abuse of a qualified privilege leaving the defendant liable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).