KND Corp. v. Hartcom, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[i]t would make little sense to require a party being sued to initiate [a § 52-410] action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Success Centers, Inc. v. Huntington Learning Centers, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-09-01· cited 61×
• Ebenstein & Ebenstein, P.C. v. Smith Thibault Corp.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1989-09-19· cited 14×
• Merrill Lynch & Co. v. City of Waterbury
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1994-04-05· cited 4×
• Taylor v. Synergy Productions Ltd.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1990-06-05· cited 3×
• Franco v. East Shore Development, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-10-29· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schwarzschild v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-09-06· cited 90×
• Jones v. Civil Service Commission
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-08-01· cited 69×
• Gores v. Rosenthal
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1961-03-28· cited 38×
• Waterbury Teachers Ass'n v. City of Waterbury
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-03-07· cited 35×
• Kantrowitz v. Perlman
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1968-03-06· cited 33×
• Covenant Insurance v. Banks
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-04-10· cited 27×