Knaub v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that claims dismissed with leave to 23 amend which are not re-alleged in an amended pleading may be “considered 24 waived if not repled.”
• noting that \the district court was within its discretion by precluding expert testimony as a sanction for the [defendant's] failure to seasonably supplement its interrogatory responses pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(e)(1)\
• “§ 2241 petition must be filed in the district where the 23 petitioner is in custody”
• “It is unreasonable to protect the RTC from operation of the exclusion merely because [the insurer] was unable to predict that Congress would restructure its regulatory framework of depository institutions and create a new federal agency.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).