Skip to main content
· 5/26/2009

Knappenberger v. City of Phoenix

Citations

  • 566 F.3d 936
  • 29 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 293
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 11106
  • 92 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,572
  • 2009 WL 1444557

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that voluntary departures do not serve as deprivations of protected interests in employment
  • courts should not deny leave to amend unless “the pleading could not possibly be cured by the allegation of other facts”
  • “Where dismissal is appropriate, a court should grant 2 || leave to amend unless the plaintiff could not possibly cure the defects in the pleading.”
  • “Where dismissal is 25 appropriate, a court should grant leave to amend unless the plaintiff could not possibly cure 26 the defects in the pleading.”
  • “Where dismissal is appropriate, a court should grant 13 leave to amend unless the plaintiff could not possibly cure the defects in the pleading.”
  • “Leave to amend should be granted unless the district court ‘determines that the pleading could not possibly be cured by the allegation of other facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Kleinfeld, Ikuta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.