Knapp v. City of Decatur

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that courts “routinely” find that children are capable of appreciating the risk of falling
• noting that courts \routinely\ find that children are capable of appreciating the risk of falling
• noting that courts \routinely\ find that children are capable of appreciating the risk of falling
• no duty on the part of an owner or occupier to a six-year-old child who was injured while playing on a four-foot pile of sand; the danger of falling was a risk not beyond the appreciation of a six-year-old child
• no duty on the part of an owner or occupier to a six-year-old child who was injured while playing on a four-foot pile of sand; the danger of falling was a risk not beyond the appreciation of a six-year-old child
• no duty on the part of an owner or occupier to a six-year-old child who was injured while playing on a four-foot pile of sand; the danger of falling was a risk not beyond the appreciation of a six- 15 year-old child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).