Skip to main content
· 6/30/2009

Knapp v. Bulun

Citations

  • 911 N.E.2d 541
  • 392 Ill. App. 3d 1018

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that service on a paralegal who worked for a corporate defendant’s registered agent did not constitute proper service on the corporation since she was not designated as an agent to receive process
  • holding that service on a paralegal who worked for a corporate defendant’s registered agent did not constitute proper service on the corporation since she was not designated as an agent to receive process
  • holding that service on a paralegal who worked for a corporate defendant’s registered agent did not constitute proper service on the corporation since she was not designated as an agent to receive process
  • affirming the circuit court’s grant of motions to terminate where the plaintiff failed to file a motion to convert within six months of filing the complaint that named the respondents in discovery notwithstanding the fact that the plaintiff failed to serve them
  • “[a]n appeal from a final judgment draws into issue all previous interlocutory orders that produced the final judgment”
  • where defendants did not assert that they would be prejudiced, court had jurisdiction to consider issue not specifically identified in notice of appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.