Skip to main content
· 7/10/1998

Knapp v. Apfel

Citations

  • 11 F. Supp. 2d 235
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10268
  • 1998 WL 390839

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] finding that the Commissioner has failed to specify the basis for his conclusions is [a] compelling cause for remand.”
  • “The RFC is determined by considering all relevant evidence”
  • “The RFC is determined by considering all relevant evidence”
  • “The RFC is determined by considering all relevant evidence’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McAVOY

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.