Kmart Corporation v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Illinois Supreme Court, in Yorkville, “highlighted that an important factor is whether the insuring party [] had actual notice of the lawsuit”
• finding that the plaintiff waived its preyudgment interest argument where, among other things, the plaintiff “did not cite a single case supporting its position that it [was] entitled to preyudgment interest” in its district court briefing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).