Klutho v. The Company Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that lack of section 2-a hearing was forfeited by failure to object in the trial court on that basis
• holding that jury unanimity is required for the findings that a defendant committed two or more acts of sexual abuse over a more than thirty-day period.
• reasoning that, in the absence of “language expressly requiring a waiver” in the statute, any error in failing to hold an Article 38.37 hearing “is subject to the general requirement of preservation, and is therefore subject to forfeiture”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).