Kluth v. Bolduc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that while prior inconsistent statements may “help [courts to] determine” a party’s true place of residence, they cannot “conclusively establish or defeat subject matter jurisdiction”
• applying judicial estoppel to prevent members of the plaintiff company from assuming a contrary position with respect to their domicile and therefore finding that there was no diversity jurisdiction
• “Diversity jurisdiction requires that all adverse parties to a litigation are completely diverse in their citizenships.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).