Klose v. Mende

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that there was no valid dedication because there was no order or petition in the town clerk’s records
• finding that there was no valid dedication because there was no order or petition in the town clerk’s records
• “The common and ordinary use establishing the right to an easement by prescription limits and qualifies it so that it cannot be given to different uses and purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Price v. Philip Morris, Inc.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2015-12-10· cited 39×
• Klose v. Mende
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-01-28· cited 12×
• Herren v. Beshears
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2025-09-12

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Board of Directors of Bloomfield Club Recreation Ass'n v. Hoffman Group Inc.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1999-05-20· cited 150×
• First Fed. Sav. Bank of Proviso Township v. Drovers Nat. Bank
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-08-14· cited 35×
• Schultz v. Kant
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-10-10· cited 20×
• Rodgers v. Hess
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1927-04-20· cited 4×
• Tower v. Pitstick
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1870-09-15· cited 3×