Klo-Zik Co. v. General Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a warranty was not conspicuous when on the “back of a piece of paper” and was “not in bold or capital lettering”
• “In order for the disclaimer to be effective, the plaintiffs must have had an opportunity to examine it prior to consummation of the contract for sale.”
• the truck motors did not perform

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).