Klitzman, Klitzman & Gallagher v. Krut

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that searches of an attorney’s confidential files has “the potential for undermining the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine, and thereby chilling communications between lawyer and client”
• “Where, as here, plaintiff institutes an independent [Rule 41(g)] action for such return, there is no question but that courts may utilize their equitable power to order pre-indictment relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).