Skip to main content
· 10/18/2010

Kling v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 239 P.3d 670
  • 50 Cal. 4th 1068
  • 116 Cal. Rptr. 3d 217
  • 2010 Cal. LEXIS 10684

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the rationale for requiring notice to the victim in Rule 17(c)(3
  • “[Disclosure of the identity of the subpoenaed party and the nature of the records sought may, in many circumstances, effectuate the People’s right to due process under the California Constitution.”
  • “[D]isclosure of the identity of the subpoenaed party and the nature of the records sought may, in many circumstances, effectuate the People’s right to due process under the California Constitution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baxter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.