Kline v. the Kemper Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• characterizing Pennsylvania’s insurance law as soundly rejecting the contention that policy definition of injury or bodily injury encompass mental or emotional harm
• applying Pennsylvania law and noting excess policy\does not come 8 into play\ until primary coverage limit has been reached

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).