Kline v. Tennessee Valley Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is the rare situation when direct evidence of discrimination is readily available ....”
• “The direct evidence and circumstantial evidence paths are mutually exclusive . . . . [I]f a plaintiff attempts to prove its [sic] case using the McDonnell Douglas-Burdine paradigm, then the party is not required to introduce direct evidence of discrimination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Kline v. Tennessee Valley Authority

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Kline v. Tennessee Valley Authority
  E.D. Tennessee· 1992-01-23· cited 1×