Kline Iron & Steel Co. v. Gray Communications Consultants, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “engineering, design, fabrication and inspection should not be characterized as separate services” because “[t]he price of virtually every product sold includes charges for such ‘services’ ”
• holding the “predominant thrust” of an alleged contract for the “manufacture and erection” of a television tower was for the sale of goods where roughly 26% of the contract price was for services
• a writing did not satisfy the merchant’s exception when its printed “terms and conditions” were “for immediate acceptance” and when the form provided a line labeled “ACCEPTED” for the buyer to sign and date

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).