Skip to main content
· 11/20/1980

Klimko v. Rose

Citations

  • 422 A.2d 418
  • 84 N.J. 496
  • 1980 N.J. LEXIS 1401

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying common knowledge doctrine to chiropractor who continued to apply pressure to patient’s neck after patient became unconscious
  • permitting physician to opine on matters relating to negligence claim against chiropractor
  • “[A]n industry or professional standard or custom ... is not conclusive if, regardless of the standard or custom, the exercise of reasonable care would call for a higher standard____”
  • chiropractor continued neck adjustments after patient became dizzy, sweaty, and gray
  • chiropractor continued neck adjustments after patient became dizzy, sweaty, and gray
  • chiropractor continued neck treatment after patient became dizzy, sweaty, and grey

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilentz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.