Klick v. Crosstown State Bank of Ham Lake, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a three-year restriction was unreasonable where employee required no special training
• finding covenant’s three-year duration unreasonable where employee possessed “no substantial insight into the [employer’s] operation”
• “‘[I]n employment cases, a court should be permitted to make changes.’ The logical inference from this statement is that it is at the discretion of the trial court to modify the provisions in equitable situations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).