Klemp v. Hergott Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a] court will not rewrite a contract to suit one of the parties, but will enforce the terms as written”
• stating that there “is a strong presumption against provisions that easily could have been included in the contract but were not,” and a “court will not add another term about which an agreement is silent”
• stating that there \is a strong presumption against provisions that easily could have been included in the contract but were not [and a] court will not add another term about which an agreement is silent\
• plain language of agreement clearly indicated defendants were only required to pursue rezoning before the city council
• plain language of agreement clearly indicated defendants were only required to pursue rezoning before the city council
• parties did include term; fact that it was ill-defined did not mean parties intended contract to be silent as to that term

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).