Kleiss v. Cassida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming judgment notwithstanding the verdict after concluding that the plaintiff's expert's opinions were conclusory and unsupported
• affirming judgment notwithstanding the verdict after concluding that the plaintiff’s expert’s opinions were conclusory and unsupported
• affirming judgment notwithstanding the verdict after concluding that the plaintiff’s expert’s opinions were conclusory and unsupported
• “An expert opinion is only as valid as the reasons for the opinion.”
• court “decline[d] to allow the plaintiffs a second chance” where jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs, but awarding no damages, logically amounted to a verdict for defendant and the jury “simply used the wrong verdict form”
• court \decline[d] to allow the plaintiffs a second chance\ where jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs, but awarding no damages, logically amounted to a verdict for defendant and the jury \simply used the wrong verdict form\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).