Kleinsmith v. Shurtleff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “typically it is harder for a nonresident to conduct a business or a profession in a state than it is for a resident”
• stating that the claimant can prevail under the dormant commerce clause by showing that a facially neutral state statute “discriminates in practical effect”
• stating that the claimant can prevail under the dormant commerce clause by showing that a facially neutral state statute “discriminates in practical effect”
• observing that, although trust statute would permit Utah attorneys to use home as requisite place of business within state, it was hardly apparent that many would wish to do so
• noting a law “may be neutral in its terms and still discriminate against interstate commerce”
• declining to reach the merits of appellant’s vagueness claim where the district court had declined to do so after it was first raised in a motion to reconsider

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).