Kleinjans v. Lombardi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[HRCP] Rule 17(d), by requiring a description of the defendant’s interest in the action, ensures that a person receiving the complaint will have sufficient notice that he [or she] is the defendant intended.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Marsland v. Pang
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1985-05-15· cited 32×
• Penn v. Transportation Lease Hawaii, Ltd.
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1981-07-02· cited 21×
• SCH. DIST. NO. 351 ONEIDA CTY v. Oneida Ed. Ass'n
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1977-07-22· cited 20×
• Wahba, LLC v. Usrp (Don), LLC
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2005-02-23· cited 12×
• Russell v. Attco, Inc.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1996-09-11· cited 10×
• State v. Armitage.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2014-01-28· cited 10×
• Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Wallace
  Utah Supreme Court· 1978-01-11· cited 7×
• Chung v. Ogata
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1972-02-25· cited 4×
• Bailey v. United States
  D. Hawaii· 2003-10-10· cited 4×