Kleinfeld v. Rand

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a university’s code of conduct, which did not qualify as positive law, was neither facially overbroad nor unconstitutionally vague
• holding that a school did not violate a student's First Amendment rights in suspending the student where he persistently harassed another student
• affirming summary judgment entered against a defendant who could have petitioned for a writ of certiorari with the state supreme court regarding his expulsion from college
• dismissing student’s procedural due process claim where state provided appellate remedy for university decisions
• assuming for purposes of that appeal that a Title IX violation may be established via the “erroneous outcome” test recognized in Yusuf v. Vassar Coll., 35 F.3d 709 (2d. Cir. 1994)
• affirming the grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant because the plaintiff had not presented any evidence that the outcome was erroneous, but declining to address “whether there is a causal connection between the outcome of the proceeding and gender bias”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).