Klein v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We agree that in assessing a 22 vagueness challenge, we must consider [the] law as a whole.”
• “[P]rotections against impermissibly vague laws . . . are at their maximum” in the First Amendment context.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).