Klein v. Sunbeam Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “we think the question of qualified privilege is a matter for defense depending upon the facts and circumstances . . . . it may not be raised by a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) but should be made a matter of answer to be supported by proof at the trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Fine v. Mayor & Council of Wilmington
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1953-01-14· cited 8×
• Klein v. Sunbeam Corp.
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1953-03-13· cited 6×
• Commonwealth Oil Refining Co. v. Houdry Process Corp.
  D. Puerto Rico· 1960-08-04· cited 6×
• Two Farms, Inc. v. Davis, Bowen & Freidel, Inc
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2018-06-04

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Barrow Steamship Co. v. Kane
  Supreme Court· 1898-04-11· cited 226×
• Klein v. Sunbeam Corp.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1952-12-31· cited 20×
• Model Heating Co. v. Magarity
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1911-10-16· cited 18×
• Klein v. Sunbeam Corp.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1951-11-27· cited 7×
• Mazzotti v. WJ Rainey, Inc.
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1950-11-30· cited 5×
• Mazzotti v. W. J. Rainey, Inc.
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1950-11-30· cited 4×