Skip to main content

Klein v. Klein

Citations

  • 555 A.2d 382
  • 150 Vt. 466
  • 1988 Vt. LEXIS 212

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that trial court has considerable discretion in making maintenance award
  • noting that different judges dealing with same case should reach essentially the same result
  • recognizing one purpose of 3 maintenance is “recompense for the contributions of a homemaker to the family’s well-being which was not otherwise made” (quotation omitted)
  • explaining that rehabilitative maintenance is “temporary maintenance in order that the spouse can acquire the skills and experience to become self-supporting”
  • explaining that one purpose of permanent maintenance is to recompense for contributions to family's wellbeing that were not otherwise accounted for and emphasizing that most important factor is length of marriage
  • explaining that “rehabilitative maintenance alone would not be sufficient unless the court can find, based on the evidence, that defendant will be able to support herself at the standard of living established during the marriage”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peck, Dooley, Barney, Keyser, Springer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.