Klein v. Cornelius

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing Scholes’ reasoning and concluding, “[i]n essence, the corporations were creditors themselves”
• “[B]ecause Ponzi schemes are insolvent by definition, we presume that transfers from such entities involve actual intent to defraud.”
• “[B]ecause Ponzi schemes are insolvent by definition, we presume that transfers from such entities involve actual intent to defraud.”
• “As an initial matter, federal law allows nationwide service of process under the CEA.”
• federal courts have jurisdiction over ancillary state-law claims
• federal courts have jurisdiction over ancillary state-law claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).