Kleim v. Superior Court of Cal.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that large quantity of drugs—5.1 kilograms of methamphetamine—showed knowledge because “a drug trafficker would not have entrusted the shipment to an untested courier”
• explaining that large quantity of drugs—5.1 kilograms of methamphetamine—showed knowledge because “a drug trafficker would not have entrusted the shipment to an untested courier”
• noting that subjective awareness “often overlaps with” actual knowledge
• instruction appropriate when “the circumstances were so overwhelmingly suspicious that [the defendant’s] failure to conduct further inspection or inquiry suggests a conscious effort to avoid incriminating knowledge” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).