Klaw v. Life Pub. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Relying on Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 45 and finding the 19 “scope of discovery through a subpoena is the same as that applicable to Rule 34 and the 20 other discovery rules.”
• “Relevancy, for purposes of 10 discovery, is defined broadly, although it is not without ultimate and necessary boundaries.”
• “Relevancy, for purposes of 21 discovery, is defined broadly, although it is not without ultimate and necessary boundaries.”
• “Relevancy, for the 24 purposes of discovery, is defined broadly, although it is not without ultimate and necessary 25 boundaries.”
• “Relevancy, for the purposes of 13 discovery, is defined broadly, although it is not without ultimate and necessary boundaries.”
• “Relevancy, for the purposes 12 of discovery, is defined broadly, although it is not without ultimate and necessary boundaries.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).