Skip to main content
· 5/4/1981

Klausz v. Culross

Citations

  • 81 A.D.2d 836
  • 438 N.Y.S.2d 837
  • 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11501

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that attorney has fiduciary duty “to bring to the client’s attention all relevant considerations” and denying defendant-attorney summary judgment because triable issues of fact existed regarding adequacy of attorney’s disclosures about conflicts of interest
  • finding summary judgment should not have been granted since an issue of fact existed as to whether the attorney breached “its fiduciary duty to bring to the client’s attention all relevant considerations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.