· 6/30/2006
Klaus v. Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. of Ohio
Citations
- 437 F. Supp. 2d 706
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46619
- 2006 WL 1836074
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that cross-motions for summary judgment do not alter the applicable standard of review, since each party's motion is reviewed separately by the Court
- “The determination whether a material breach of an agreement has occurred is generally a question of fact.”
- “Under Ohio law, customer restrictions may substitute for a geographic restriction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sargus
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.