Skip to main content
· 6/30/2006

Klaus v. Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. of Ohio

Citations

  • 437 F. Supp. 2d 706
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46619
  • 2006 WL 1836074

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that cross-motions for summary judgment do not alter the applicable standard of review, since each party's motion is reviewed separately by the Court
  • “The determination whether a material breach of an agreement has occurred is generally a question of fact.”
  • “Under Ohio law, customer restrictions may substitute for a geographic restriction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sargus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.