Skip to main content
· 9/8/2003

Klass v. Klass

Citations

  • 831 A.2d 1067
  • 377 Md. 13
  • 2003 Md. LEXIS 538

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying same rule to state court proceeding and explaining that “[t]he clearly predominant rule is that jurisdiction is concurrent, and that the court in which the non-bankruptcy case is pending may determine the effect of the stay on that case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.