· 9/8/2003
Klass v. Klass
Citations
- 831 A.2d 1067
- 377 Md. 13
- 2003 Md. LEXIS 538
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying same rule to state court proceeding and explaining that “[t]he clearly predominant rule is that jurisdiction is concurrent, and that the court in which the non-bankruptcy case is pending may determine the effect of the stay on that case”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.