Klaskin v. Klepak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the McFail factors are “[s]ome of the factors which this court deems persuasive ”
• the lack of having a disinterested attorney question the decedent regarding his understanding of a transaction meant that the presumption was not overcome
• “An attorney who deals with a client *** must comply with at least minimal standards of professional conduct”
• a trial court’s judgment after a bench trial is reviewed under a manifest weight of the evidence standard
• “Where several inferences may be drawn from conflicting evidence, the reviewing court must accept that which supports the trial court’s decision.”
• the lack of having a disinterested attorney question the decedent regarding his understanding of a transaction meant that the presumption was not overcome

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).