Kjesbo v. Ricks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a party’s interference with a contract may be justified when it “asserts in good faith a legally protected interest of [its] own” (citation omitted)
• \There is no wrongful interference with a contract where one asserts in good faith a legally protected interest of his own ....\ (cleaned up)
• “There is no wrongful interference with a contract where one asserts in good faith a legally protected interest of his own . . . .” (cleaned up)
• “It is enough if the defendant had knowledge of facts which, if followed by reasonable inquiry, would have led to complete disclosure of the contractual relations and rights of the parties.”
• listing elements of claim for tortious interference with contract
• dismissing tortious interference with contract claim for lack of breach

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).