Kizer v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, because a naturalization applicant had failed to disclose that he had children on his visa application, his \testimony ... that he had never given 'false or misleading information' while 'applying for any immigration benefit' was plainly false\
• explaining that applicant who knowingly lied under oath at naturalization interview “intended to obtain an immigration benefit— naturalization—by denying that he had made it”
• describing an applicant’s failure to list children with whom he had lost contact as a “glaring omission” and affirming denial of citizenship
• “[L]ying about previous lies . . . reveals a lack of good moral character.” (cleaned up)
• \The undisputed facts show that [the naturalization applicant] was aware of the misrepresentation on his visa application and thus that he intended to obtain an immigration benefit-naturalization-by denying that he had made it.\
• “The undisputed facts show that [the petitioner] was aware of the misrepresentation on his visa application and thus that he intended to obtain an immigration benefit—naturalization—by denying that he had made it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).