Skip to main content
· 7/31/1990

Kitzmann v. Kitzmann

Citations

  • 459 N.W.2d 789
  • 1990 N.D. LEXIS 158
  • 1990 WL 108800

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding it would be inequitable for one spouse to include his attorney’s fees in the marital estate when the other spouse did not
  • “[W]e believe that the trial court should still consider [the wife’s] argument that [the husband] paid his fees from the marital assets, as it would be inequitable for [the wife] to have actually contributed to a portion of [the husband’s] attorney’s fees.”
  • “[W]e believe that the trial court should still consider [the wife’s] argument that [the husband] paid his fees from the marital assets, as it would be inequitable for [the wife] to have actually contributed to a portion of [the husband’s] attorney’s fees.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vande Walle, Erickstad, Gierke, Meschke, Levine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.