District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/2/2005
Kittles v. State
Citations
- 897 So. 2d 517
- 2005 WL 475341
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting instruction on inference given in case where possession of stolen property shown to be no more than eighteen hours after burglary
- “Kitties’ explanation that his sister had given him the stolen jewelry was patently unreasonable in light of the markings on the rings and his possession of the items within no more than eighteen hours of the burglary.”
- “[Defendant’s] explanation that his sister had given him the stolen jewelry was patently unreasonable in light of the markings on the rings and his possession of the items within no more than eighteen hours of the burglary.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Florida· 1970-07-22· cited 45×
- E.C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-27· cited 27×
- Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-09· cited 18×
- Battle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-25· cited 8×
- Bertone v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-21· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.