Skip to main content
· 3/5/1999

Kitco, Inc. v. Corporation for General Trade

Citations

  • 706 N.E.2d 581
  • 1999 Ind. App. LEXIS 286
  • 1999 WL 112525

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting split between Heeb v. Smith, 613 N.E.2d 416, 420 (Ind.Ct.App.1993) (following Liberty Lobby ), and Chester v. Indianapolis Newspapers, Inc., 553 N.E.2d 137, 140-41 (Ind.Ct.App.1990) (not following Liberty Lobby )
  • noting split between Heeb v. Smith, 613 N.E.2d 416, 420 (Ind. Ct. App. 1993) (following Liberty Lobby), and Chester v. Indianapolis Newspapers, Inc., 553 N.E.2d 137, 140-41 (Ind. Ct. App. 1990) (not following Liberty Lobby)
  • “negligence or failure to investigate is not sufficient to establish actual malice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bailey, Najam, Sharpnack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.