Skip to main content
· 1/27/2017

Kitchen v. Spearman

Citations

  • 676 F. App'x 726

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying a motion to dismiss when plaintiff's alleged trade secrets were “software programs... customer lists; pricing templates, [and] vendor lists, ... among other things.”
  • discussing the elements of the claim under Colorado law and noting that “expectations of receiving future contracts are protected against tortious interference”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hurwitz, Scannlain, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.