· 1/27/2017
Kitchen v. Spearman
Citations
- 676 F. App'x 726
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying a motion to dismiss when plaintiff's alleged trade secrets were “software programs... customer lists; pricing templates, [and] vendor lists, ... among other things.”
- discussing the elements of the claim under Colorado law and noting that “expectations of receiving future contracts are protected against tortious interference”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hurwitz, Scannlain, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.