Kitchen v. Long

Citations

• 67 Fla. 72

Syllabus

<p>Where the seller of a fine looking mule refused to guarantee the soundness of the latter, but was well aware that it was afflicted with a hidden defect, not discoverable by ordinary observation, and where he untruthfully stated to the buyer that he did not know anything about the mule, and intentionally concealed the defect in the animal, the buyer when he discovered he had been imposed upon had a right to rescind the trade and recover his own property, traded for the diseased mule.</p>