Kitchen v. Crotona Park West Housing Development Fund Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating our court should preserve an ineffective-assistance claim, “[i]f the development of the ineffective-assistance claim in the appellate brief was insufficient to allow its consideration”
• noting “the court of appeals should not consider” an ineffective-assistance claim if it is insufficiently developed “in the appellate brief”
• noting our court should preserve an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, “[i]f the development of the ineffective- assistance claim in the appellate brief was insufficient to allow its consideration”
• finding the record insufficient to resolve an ineffective-assistance claim raised as a fallback when the defendant “only include[ed] a cursory discussion of ineffective assistance in a footnote”
• providing when the record is not sufficiently developed to address an ineffective-assistance claim on direct appeal, the appellate court should not reach the issue and permit the defendant to raise the issue in a postconviction-relief action
• “When counsel fails to preserve error at trial, a defendant can have the matter reviewed as an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).