Kitchen v. Burge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that, “[sjince Daley was acting as a prosecutor at the time he obtained the information in question, he is immune from having to disclose the information”
• differentiating between a prosecutor who takes a statement and one who feeds answers to the suspect
• denying motion to dismiss Brady claim against City Officials because they allegedly suppressed evidence of Kitchen’s innocence after assuming public office
• rejecting argument that due process claim should be construed as malicious prosecution claim
• “[T]he Illinois and federal doctrines of prosecutorial immunity are coterminous . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).