Kissun v. Humana, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the mere fact that one corporation is a subsidiary of another does not alone serve to insulate the parent where the evidence can establish the legal requirements of an actual or apparent agency relationship between the two corporations”
• “[P]iercing the corporate veil results in disregard for the separate existence of parent and subsidiary.”
• \[P]iercing the corporate veil results in disregard for the separate existence of parent and subsidiary.\
• one type of abuse is when the corporate entity serves “as a mere alter ego or business conduit of another”
• “[T]he parent/subsidiary relationship alone does not, as a matter of law, preclude such corporations from establishing the legal relationships of principal and apparent agent or joint venturers . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).