Kismet Acquisition v. Alejandro Diaz-Barba

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a 8 bankruptcy court “retained jurisdiction to supervise the course of conduct mandated in 9 the judgment” and “[t]o account for . . . changed facts” after the judgment was entered
• noting courts may properly take judicial notice of “court filings and other matters of public record”
• setting forth standard of review and stating that a bankruptcy court may hold a party in civil contempt if the party “violated a specific and definite order of the court” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• “A party may be held in civil contempt only if it violated a specific and definite order of the court” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)
• the contemnors must come forward with competent evidence of the inability to comply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).